M1 Oscilloscope Tools vs Tektronix JIT3
Product charting also reveals significant differences between M1 ($995-$6495), and JIT3 ($7500)
- M1 Oscilloscope Tools supports more Tektronix scopes than JIT3 does, and of course, more LeCroy, Agilent and Yokogawa scopes.
- Some
Rj/Dj capability is included. But it doesn’t do error calibration, does
not calibrate instrument noise out, is not validated over a broad
jitter space, has no convergence/divergence detection and does not
specify it’s typical error in detail as M1 OT does with the
Decomposition Performance Explorer (DPE).
- Eye-diagram package: $7500
- Compliance tests are “extra” - $995-$7500 each.
- Debug – very limited compared to M1 OT.
- Automation
- No ability to automate sequences of measurements or add measurements.
M1 OT has ScriptBuilder™, a great graphical tool for doing this easily.
- Productivity – nope.
- Portfolio – no offline analysis or no client/server (M1 Reader), no LabView.
- Product
philosophy things – No scalable pricing, proprietary, not portable,
fine-grained á-la-carte-ing (i.e. you pay for the sugar), and it costs
more to own because of these things.
- Not
shown here – Wave Inspector adds some additional but limited debug (2
limited and 1 unlimited cell in debug area), and is available only on
select scopes.
- Summary vs M1 Oscilloscope Tools: JIT3 costs more, does less
Click to enlarge...
| | |